Zum Inhalt springen
stackschmiede.de
DE
#07 3 days – 8 weeks

Legacy Modernization

Replace outdated software — rebuild instead of endlessly patching. VB6, old PHP, MS Access, Delphi, early C#. Years of C#/C++ history meet modern stacks (Django, Go, Postgres). Honestly priced audit entry point.

Range
€1,900–€14,900
ex VAT
Duration
3 days – 8 weeks
Terms
14 days
50% upfront

Why this is its own offering

VB6 still runs. On thousands of machines in German mid-market companies. For 20+ years. Reliably. But the original developer is retired, the IDE only runs on Windows 10 with tricks, and nobody in-house can implement a new requirement. Same applies to old MS Access databases with 15 years of history, early PHP 4 codebases, or first-generation C# WinForms solutions from 2006.

Modernization is not a standard web project. You need:

  • Someone who understands the old world — not just “let’s replace that with React”.
  • Someone who takes migration risk seriously — unchecked data migration destroys trust.
  • Realistic packages — not everything has to be replaced at once.

Three packages

💡 Modernization Audit — 2-3 days, written recommendation

You don’t yet know whether and how to modernize. The audit clarifies that.

  • Inventory: which languages, frameworks, libraries run here? Which DB? Which interfaces?
  • Risk assessment: EOL status, CVE landscape, GDPR/NIS2 gaps.
  • Options outline: continue operating, partial modernization, full rebuild.
  • Cost estimate for each option, with assumptions and open questions documented.
  • Written recommendation as a PDF.

Common next step: either a retainer (see retainer package) for ongoing minor adjustments to the old system, or partial/full modernization.

Effort: 2-3 working days. Price: €1,900.

Partial Modernization — one critical module rebuilt

Part of your legacy software is the pain. Reporting is unusable. The web frontend is stuck 15 years in the past. The database access layer is a security risk. We replace that one module — the rest of the old system stays as it is.

Typical candidates:

  • Reporting module rebuilt (e.g., Jasper Reports instead of VB6 print code)
  • Web frontend on legacy backend (modern SSR via Astro/Django templates, existing APIs)
  • Database abstraction layer (ORM migration, e.g., replacing Access DB with Postgres)
  • Authentication module (instead of basic Windows Auth: OIDC/Keycloak)

Effort: 4-6 weeks. Price: €6,900.

Full Rebuild — old system → modern stack

The old system has to go. We build in parallel — on a modern stack (Django or Go + Postgres + web UI) — and migrate in phases.

  • Parallel operation: old and new run side-by-side for a time. Low risk.
  • Data migration: with integrity validation before each step. No black box.
  • Feature parity before shutdown, with a sign-off list per use case.
  • Handover: docs, training, old-system shutdown, optional 6-month iteration retainer.

Effort: 8 weeks (for manageable systems). Price: €14,900.

Larger scopes (enterprise migrations with 10+ modules) we discuss in the audit first — no flat price, but a scope memo after discovery.

Why I can do this

My early IT years (2005-2013, see /en/ueber) were classical application development and interface programming:

  • C# (.NET Framework 2.0 to 4.x) — WinForms, web services, DB access via ADO.NET
  • C++ — for native components and legacy integration
  • Interface programming — SOAP, XML, CSV, legacy protocols, everything that wasn’t REST
  • Windows Server + Linux backend admin in the same person

This isn’t a marketing USP, it’s my real work biography. I understand old stacks without romance — I lived through them, know their pain points, and know why they were built that way at the time. They don’t collapse overnight — but they aren’t future-proof either.

On the modern stack (Django, Go, Postgres, Astro, Flutter) I’ve been productively active again since 2024 — with Claude Code as AI co-pilot. The combination is rare: old-stack experience + new-stack currency in one person.

What I don’t offer

  • SAP migration or mainframe replacement (scope too large, requires specialist advisory — happy to refer).
  • Pure code translation without architecture review: rarely worthwhile. If done, done right.
  • “Only modernize the UI” without backend review: that’s a bandaid I won’t sell.

Process (full rebuild as example)

  1. Audit (2-3 days) — binding inventory.
  2. Scope memo (week 1-2) — migration plan, milestones, decision points.
  3. Parallel build (weeks 3-6) — new system is built, old continues unchanged.
  4. Data migration test (week 7) — dry runs with production data copy.
  5. Cutover (week 8) — switchover in a maintenance window, monitoring on high alert.
  6. Aftercare (30-90 days) — firefighting phase, sign-off, old-system shutdown or read-only archival.

Compliance aspects (important for legacy)

  • GDPR data residency: old systems often store sensitive fields in plaintext. Migration is the right moment to fix that.
  • NIS2 (since October 2024): many SMEs now fall under the directive. Old software with CVE gaps is a problem.
  • IT Security Act 2.0: audit-capable log chains are becoming mandatory.

These compliance topics are part of every modernization — no upcharge.

Includes

  • Inventory: language, dependencies, data schema, build chain
  • Risk analysis: library EOL, security CVEs, compliance gaps
  • Migration plan with milestones and decision points
  • Parallel-operation strategy (old + new running simultaneously during migration)
  • Data migration incl. integrity validation
  • Training on the new system
  • Optional: read-only archive of the old system for audit needs
  • For full rebuild: modern stack (Django/Go + Postgres) with tests, CI/CD, documentation